Philanthropy? Sorry – humans only

Katherine MacDonald

The traditional anthropocentric paradigm of philanthropy is impeding support for environmental and animal welfare causes

Years ago, I stood on Montreal’s famous Sainte-Catherine street holding a petition pad in one hand and a donation pad in the other, asking people to help end animal cruelty. A man spat at my feet: ‘How could you help animals when there are children suffering?’. Interactions like this still come to mind when I reflect on the sad state of non-human philanthropy, in Canada and globally. Is there space to defend animals and the environment within the very anthropocentric constraints of western philanthropy?

Can philanthropy be ‘non-human’?

According to its etymological roots, philanthropy is inherently anthropocentric. Yet, countless philanthropic actors and initiatives are fighting to defend non-human causes. Animal shelters rescue abandoned pets, conservation efforts protect natural habitats and animal species, and activists defend animal rights and our natural world.

 
Next Analysis to read

Going the last mile of giving

Nkosi Moyo